32 pages tagged "research metrics"
Publish or Perish training resources
Lists training resources for Publish or Perish
The four C's of getting cited
Explains how competence, collaboration, care and communication help to ensure your work is getting the citation impact it deserves
From h-index to hIa: The ins and outs of research metrics
Introduces the hI,annual as a new research metric that allows comparison across disciplines and career stages
Transcending the (non)sense of academic rankings
When Knowledge Wins article features in AMLE virtual collection on Principles for Responsible Management Education
Citation analysis for the Social Sciences: metrics and data-sources
Argues that a fair and inclusive cross-disciplinary comparison of research performance is possible using Google Scholar and the hIa metric
Publish or Perish tutorial
Publish or Perish tutorial
Publish or Perish
Explains the use of Publish or Perish and its metrics
New: Publish or Perish now also exports abstracts
Introduces a new Publish or Perish feature: exporting of publication abstracts
Creating a supportive and collaborative research culture at Middlesex University Business School
How supportive and collaborative research cultures can improve international research rankings
Middlesex University rising in the research rankings
Quick summary of MDX's strongly improved position in three international research rankings
STI conference Leiden: metrics vs peer review
An extensive report on the conference, my presentation on the REF and gender initiatives
The mystery of the phantom reference
Shows how sloppy writing and sloppy quality control lead to a non-existing article being cited nearly 400 times
The phantom reference strikes again
Update of a 2017 white paper that shows that - with over 500 citations - the phantom reference is alive and kicking
LIS-Bibliometrics 10th anniversary event: The Future of Research Evaluation
Listing of all video recordings at the LIS-Bibliometrics 10th year anniversary conference
"Publier or perir": English in French academia
Guest post by Anne Laure Humbert on the role of English in French academia
The four C's of getting cited
Short summary of white paper explaining why competence, collaboration, care and communication help to realise the citation impact of your work
62nd edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with the 2018 ABS update
64th edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with the November 2018 CNRS update
Replication studies: learning from failure and success
Short commentary illustrating the importance of replication through two examples
57th edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with the 2016 Erasmus Journal List
61st edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with the 2017 CNRS update and the 2018 HCERES update
60th edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with the 2017 CNRS update and the 2017 Danish ministry update
58th edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with the 2016 ABDC update and the new FT50 ranking
From h-index to hIa: The ins and outs of research metrics
Explains two key research metrics and compares three sources of citation data: the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
65th edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with the June 2019 CNRS update and the June 2019 FNEGE update
The mystery of the phantom reference: a detective story
Short summary of white paper that shows how sloppy writing and sloppy quality control lead to a non-existing article being cited nearly 400 times
Running the REF on a rainy Sunday afternoon: Do metrics match peer review?
Short summary of white paper that proposes replacing the REF with a metrics-based exercise
66th edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with 2019 ABDC update
67th edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with updates for the Danish list, HCRES and CNRS
Running the REF on a rainy Sunday afternoon: Do metrics match peer review?
White paper that proposes replacing the REF with a metrics-based exercise
59th edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with the 2016 FNEGE update and the 2017 HCRES update
63rd edition of the Journal Quality List on-line
New version of the Journal Quality List with the June 2018 CNRS update
Copyright © 2021 Anne-Wil Harzing. All rights reserved. Page last modified on Sun 7 Mar 2021 01:03
