Proactive academia (2): Tips for junior academics
Sixth of eight posts on my Irish Academy of Management Distinguished Scholar Interview
In October 2022 I received the happy news that I was elected as the 2022 Irish Academy of Management Distinguished International Scholar. I received a beautiful glass sculpture and was interviewed by the amazing Alma McCarthy on the topic Towards a more inclusive and proactive academia. This post provides some tips on how junior academics can be more proactive in their careers. I will talk mostly about research, administration, and leadership as these are areas in which we often have more autonomy than in teaching.
Dare to be different and critical, but…
In research, don’t be afraid to be different and critical of current research. I have elaborated on this in a presentation I did on how International HRM research needs to change. Here are the last two steps Dare to be different and critical. I have also talked about this in my blogpost on the story of my first academic paper, which was very critical of prior research.
Yes, I know only too well that there is bias in the system. Yes, some academics - senior or junior - are self-centred, unethical, or downright nasty. But there really isn’t some sort of conspiracy to keep junior academics down. Remember that many senior academics, editors, and reviewers are only too happy to help junior academics and promote a healthy academic exchange.
And don’t think that papers by senior academics automatically get published. Yes, seniors have a better hit rate because they have experience. But if I look at my last three papers, only one had a smooth ride, the other two were rejected at two, three or even four journals, sometimes taking more than five years to see the light. My co-authors and I persisted, and in the end they all got published. And if I am very honest, they all got much better in the process.
I talk to many junior academics’ whose papers are rejected or even desk-rejected. Some are convinced the system is biased against them. But their papers are often completely unsuitable for the journal they were submitted to and are poorly written. So don’t ever send a paper to a journal without having someone else – someone who has experience with the journal in question – look at it. I still get what is called a “friendly reviewer” to read my papers before submission and I return the favour.
So, dare to be different and critical, but also be rigorous, respectful and, when you get an Revise & Resubmit, be responsive. If you do have a paper that you think is very good and you have spent a lot of time polishing it, but are struggling to get it published because it is very critical of established work, feel free reach out to me. I am always happy to give advice.
Can junior academics really contribute to administration and leadership?
Yes, there is also a lot we can do even as ECRs in shaping our academic environments. You can start small. For instance, as I mentioned in another post the JQL grew out of my ECR membership of my university's research committee in my first permanent job.
In that same job, I created a role as coordinator for international students at a time when international student support was in its infancy. This meant I could combine my research in cross-cultural management with practical sessions on cross-cultural communication skills, and advocacy for international students.
But I also ended up organising trips in Yorkshire, and even international dinners at our home, complete with a dedicated website. Did I get a workload allocation for that? No, but it did provide me with a much greater understanding of how universities could support international students. It even led to a funding application for a research project on student learning styles. And the social events were a lot of fun!!!
The most successful junior academics that I have worked with in the past 20 years were those who took initiative. They used the level of autonomy that does exist in any academic job to make improvements within their own nexus of control. They created some bottom-up improvements rather than wait for “management” to solve everything. Too often I hear academics say: someone needs to do something about this, why not be that someone? You are not a worker on a production line, you are an independent professional!
My firm belief is that everyone should take a stint in university management – taking on roles such as programme manager of a major teaching programme, HoD, PhD director, or Associate Dean – to appreciate how difficult it is to be a university manager. Academia is quite unique in that most incumbents in university management positions are academics themselves and return to being a “normal” academic after their managerial role. And unlike what some academics seem to believe you really don’t instantly become evil when you take on a managerial role 😊.
Any tips that juniors can apply instantly?
- In an email exchange, look at someone’s email signature and their Google Scholar Profile, follow up on their publications. Connect with them on LinkedIn, Twitter, and ResearchGate. Spend 5-10 minutes to turn that email exchange into a networking opportunity.
- Feel free to contact senior academics to ask them to endorse things. This is easy for them but helps you a lot. For my PhD, where I collected data in two dozen countries, I asked well-known local academics to be part of a committee of recommendation, which was featured on the questionnaires (see the picture below). Not a single one of them said no.
- Don’t self-censor. In Dutch we have a saying “Nee heb je, ja kun je krijgen”. It translates to “No is what you already have, yes is what you can get (but you need to ask)”. So, reach out to people. You might not always get a response, I don’t get a response to at least half of my emails. But if you don’t ask, you certainly don’t get a response.
- Be realistic in what you ask. Sending someone you have never met a request that might take them hours, if not days, is unlikely to be successful. Put yourself in their shoes. And if they do help you, make sure you thank them (see Thank You: The most underused words in academia?).
If you want to know more about my own early years in academia, you might enjoy reading this: Musings of recent graduate
Other posts in this series
- Inclusive Academia (1) How my career trajectory led to a focus on inclusion
- Inclusive Academia (2) Inclusive research evaluation
- Inclusive Academia (3) Supporting female academics
- Inclusive Academia (4) How to support Early Career Researchers
- Proactive Academia (1) On proactiveness in academia
- Proactive Academia (2) Tips for junior academics
- Proactive Academia (3) My advice for senior academics
- Proactive Academia (4) #PositiveAcademia: Towards a kinder academic world
Find the resources on my website useful?
I cover all the expenses of operating my website privately. If you enjoyed this post and want to support me in maintaining my website, consider buying a copy of one of my books (see below) or supporting the Publish or Perish software.
Aug 2022: Only £5.95... |
Nov 2022: Only £5.95... |
Feb 2023: Only £5.95... |
May 2023: Only £5.95... |
Related blogposts
- What's the story behind your first paper?
- CV of failures
- Be proactive, resilient & realistic!
- How to create a successful academic career: AIB - Ask, Invest & Believe
- How to address other academics by email?
Copyright © 2024 Anne-Wil Harzing. All rights reserved. Page last modified on Wed 18 Sep 2024 14:42
Anne-Wil Harzing is Emerita Professor of International Management at Middlesex University, London. She is a Fellow of the Academy of International Business, a select group of distinguished AIB members who are recognized for their outstanding contributions to the scholarly development of the field of international business. In addition to her academic duties, she also maintains the Journal Quality List and is the driving force behind the popular Publish or Perish software program.
