13.3 References
- Bar-Ilan, J. (2008) Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar, Scientometrics, 74(2): 257-271.
- Belew, R.K. (2005) Scientific impact quantity and quality: Analysis of two sources of bibliographic data, arXiv:cs.IR/0504036 v1, 11 April 2005.
- Bosman, J, Mourik, I. van, Rasch, M.; Sieverts, E., Verhoeff, H. (2006) Scopus reviewed and compared. The coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar, Utrecht: Utrecht University Library, http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/DARLIN/2006-1220-200432/Scopus doorgelicht & vergeleken - translated.pdf.
- Jacsó, P. (2005) Google Scholar: the pros and the cons, Online Information Review, 29(2): 208-214.
- Jacsó, P. (2006a) Dubious hit counts and cuckoo's eggs, Online Information Review, 30(2): 188-193.
- Jacsó, P. (2006b) Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts, Online Information Review, 30(3): 297-309.
- Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M. (2007) Google Scholar Citations and Google Web/URL Citations: A Multi-Discipline Exploratory Analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7): 1055-1065.
- Kousha, K; Thelwall, M. (2008) Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines, Scientometrics, 74(2): 273-294.
- Meho, L.I.; Yang, K. (2007) A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 21052125.
- Pauly, D.; Stergiou, K.I. (2005) Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI's Citation Index and Google Scholar's service, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, December, 33-35.
- Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D. (2008) A new look at evidence of scholarly citations in citation indexes and from web sources, Scientometrics, 74(2): 317-330.